|
|
|
|
|
|
Schedule
Click on a link for more details
Show all the abstracts
Download the booklet of abtracts
Thursday 11:00 - 12:20 Routing Problems Room 138 - Chair: Pieter Vansteenwegen
Thursday 11:00 - 12:20 Emergency operations scheduling Room 130 - Chair: El-Houssaine Aghezzaf
Thursday 11:00 - 12:20 Algorithm design Room 126 - Chair: Gerrit Janssens
Thursday 11:00 - 12:20 Multiple Objectives Room 120 - Chair: Filip Van Utterbeeck
Thursday 13:30 - 14:50 Integrated logistics Room 138 - Chair: Kris Braekers
Thursday 13:30 - 14:50 Person transportation Room 130 - Chair: Célia Paquay
Thursday 13:30 - 14:50 Continuous models Room 126 - Chair: Nicolas Gillis
Thursday 13:30 - 14:50 Integer programming Room 120 - Chair: Bernard Fortz
Thursday 15:20 - 16:20 Material handling and warehousing 1 Room 138 - Chair: Greet Vanden Berghe
Thursday 15:20 - 16:20 Operations management Room 130 - Chair: Roel Leus
Thursday 15:20 - 16:20 Matrix factorization Room 126 - Chair: Pierre Kunsch
Thursday 16:30 - 17:10 Material handling and warehousing 2 Room 138 - Chair: Katrien Ramaekers
Thursday 16:30 - 17:10 Routing and local search Room 130 - Chair: An Caris
Thursday 16:30 - 17:10 Traffic management Room 126 - Chair: Joris Walraevens
Thursday 16:30 - 17:10 Pharmaceutical supply chains Room 120 - Chair: Bart Smeulders
Friday 10:50 - 12:10 Optimization in health care Room 138 - Chair: Jeroen Beliën
Friday 10:50 - 12:10 Network design Room 130 - Chair: Jean-Sébastien Tancrez
Friday 10:50 - 12:10 Local search methodology Room 126 - Chair: Patrick De Causmaecker
Friday 10:50 - 12:10 ORBEL Award Room 120 - Chair: Frits Spieksma
Friday 13:00 - 14:00 Production and inventory management Room 138 - Chair: Tony Wauters
Friday 13:00 - 14:00 Logistics 4.0 Room 130 - Chair: Thierry Pironet
Friday 13:00 - 14:00 Data clustering Room 126 - Chair: Yves De Smet
Friday 13:00 - 14:00 Collective decision making Room 120 - Chair: Bernard De Baets
Friday 14:10 - 15:10 Sport scheduling Room 138 - Chair: Dries Goossens
- Scheduling time-relaxed double round-robin tournaments with availability constraints
David Van Bulck (Ghent University) Co-authors: Dries Goossens
- Combined proactive and reactive strategies for round robin football scheduling
Xia-jie Yi (Ghent University) Co-authors: Dries Goossens Abstract: This paper focuses on the robustness of football schedules, and how to improve it using combined proactive and reactive approaches. Although hard efforts are invested at the beginning of the season to create high-quality initial football schedules, these schedules are rarely fully played as planned. Games that are postponed or canceled, inducing deviations from the initial schedule are defined as disruptions. Fixtures as they were effectively played are referred to as the realized schedule. We assume that disruptions can only be rescheduled on a date that constitutes a so-called fictive round, which is actually not present in the initial schedule.
For the purpose of evaluating the quality of initial and realized schedules, measures based on breaks, balancedness and failures are used. A break corresponds to two consecutive games without an alternating pattern of home-away advantage. Nurmi et al. introduced k?balancedness of a schedule as the biggest difference, k, between the number of home games and away games after each round among all teams. Sometimes, there are problems with rescheduling disruptions because there is no fictive round available. We call an unsuccessfully rescheduled disruption a failure.
In order to develop schedules and rescheduling policies that are robust with respect to the aforementioned quality measures, we investigate a number of combined proactive and reactive approaches. The proactive approaches focus on developing an initial schedule that anticipates the realization of some unpredicted events. We consider two strategies in which fictive rounds are spread equally throughout the season and the second half of the season, respectively. The reactive approaches revise and re-optimize the initial schedule when a disruption occurs. Three strategies are developed here: first available fictive round, best available fictive round based on breaks and best available fictive round based on k. Particularly, we discuss these strategies under two assumptions: (i) each disrupted match should be rescheduled right away and permanently, and (ii) disruptions can be rescheduled to a fictive round and this arrangement can be changed later if more information becomes available.
Considering a double round robin (DRR) tournament with twenty teams, a mirrored canonical schedule is used as an initial plan. We randomly generate disruptions to this schedule based on probability distributions resulting from our empirical study. Combining each proactive strategy with each reactive strategy, we compare the results on three performance indexes, i.e., breaks, k, and failures.
- A constructive matheuristic strategy for the Traveling Umpire Problem
Reshma Chirayil Chandrasekharan (KU Leuven) Co-authors: Tulio A. M. Toffolo, Tony Wauters
Friday 14:10 - 15:10 Discrete choice modeling Room 130 - Chair: Virginie Lurkin
Friday 14:10 - 15:10 Data classification Room 126 - Chair: Ashwin Ittoo
|
|
|
ORBEL - Conference chair: Prof. A. Arda -
Platform: Prof. M. Schyns.
|
|
|
|