|
|
Detailed schedule
Click on a link for more details
Show all the abstracts
Thursday 30 January:
Thursday 11:15-12:30 TA-1: COMEX - Optimization 1 Room Vesale 023 - Chair: M. Schyns
Thursday 11:15-12:30 TA-2: Software and Implementation Room Vesale 020 - Chair: M. Mezmaz
Thursday 11:15-12:30 TA-3: COMEX - Smart mobility Room Vesale 025 - Chair: A. Caris
Thursday 11:15-12:30 TA-4: Systems Room Pentagone 0A11 - Chair: P. Kunsch
Thursday 14:00-15:40 TB-1: Data Analysis 1 Room Vesale 023 - Chair: X.Siebert
Thursday 14:00-15:40 TB-2: Multiple Objectives Room Vesale 020 - Chair: Y. de Smet
- Motivations for the development of a multi-objective algorithm configurator
Nguyen Thi Thanh Dang (KU Leuven KULAK) Co-authors: Patrick De Causmaecker
- Multi-Objective Optimization for the Design of 3D-Stacked Integrated Circuits
Nguyen Anh Vu Doan (Université libre de Bruxelles) Co-authors: Dragomir Milojevic, Frederic Robert, Yves De Smet
- Design safer and greener road projects by using a multiobjective optimization approach
Renaud Sarrazin (University of Brussels) Co-authors: Yves De Smet
- Deconstructing Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithms
Manuel LÓpez-ibaÑez (Université Libre de Bruxelles) Co-authors: Leonardo C. T. Bezerra and Thomas Stützle Abstract: Many studies in the literature have applied multi-objective
evolutionary algorithms (MOEAs) to multi-objective combinatorial
optimization problems. Few of them analyze the actual
contribution of the basic algorithmic components of MOEAs.
These components include the underlying EA structure, the
fitness and diversity operators, and their policy for
maintaining the population. In this paper, we compare seven MOEAs from the
literature on three bi-objective and one tri-objective variants of
the permutation flowshop problem. The overall best and worst
performing MOEAs are then used for a path-relinking-based iterative
analysis, where each of the main components of these algorithms is
analyzed to determine their contribution to the algorithms'
performance. Results show some components not to be effective, while
others only work well when simultaneously used.
Thursday 14:00-15:40 TB-3: Logistics Room Vesale 025 - Chair: D. De Wolf
Thursday 14:00-15:40 TB-4: COMEX - Applications to Economy Room Pentagone 0A11 - Chair: W. Brauers
Thursday 14:00-15:40 TB-5: Networks Room Pentagone 0A07 - Chair: B. Fortz
Thursday 16:10-17:25 TC-1: Mixed-integer nonlinear programming Room Vesale 023 - Chair: Y. Crama
Thursday 16:10-17:25 TC-2: Decision Analysis 1 Room Vesale 020 - Chair: S. Eppe
Thursday 16:10-17:25 TC-3: Routing Room Vesale 025 - Chair: K. Sörensen
Thursday 16:10-17:25 TC-4: Graphs Room Pentagone 0A11 - Chair: H. Mélot
Thursday 16:10-17:25 TC-5: Scheduling Room Pentagone 0A07 - Chair: S. Hanafi
Friday 9:00-10:15 FA-1: Queuing Room Vesale 023 - Chair: S. Wittevrongel
Friday 9:00-10:15 FA-2: Decision Analysis 2 Room Vesale 020 - Chair: R. Bisdorff
Friday 9:00-10:15 FA-3: COMEX - Optimization 2 Room Vesale 025 - Chair: M. Labbé
Friday 9:00-10:15 FA-4: Production Room Pentagone 0A11 - Chair: D. Tuyttens
Friday 14:00-15:40 FB-1: Data Analysis 2 Room Vesale 023 - Chair: P. Fortemps
Friday 14:00-15:40 FB-2: Heuristics Room Vesale 020 - Chair: T. Stützle
Friday 14:00-15:40 FB-3: COMEX - Transportation Room Vesale 025 - Chair: F. Spieksma
Friday 14:00-15:40 FB-4: Health Room Pentagone 0A11 - Chair: G. Vanden Berghe
|
|